6-Pair Buster Brown Seamless Toe Cotton Socks Dark 12

These socks are a much thinner version of a pair purchased years ago. They are cotton which is good and provided warmth on cold days. The best part of the socks is that they stay up on your ankles and do not bind if feet/ ankles swell. Ordered next size larger in case they shrink after washing.

I have many problems with my feet. These are the only sock I have been able to wear for years. They are all cotton and no elastic at all. They do not bind my ankle which swell. They wash well and come out looking like new. They do not bind my toes together. Brensa

THEY ARE EXPENSIVE, BUT WELL WORTH IT. DID NOT LIKE CHOICE OF COLORS IN SET, BUT BOUGHT ANYWAY. NO ELASTIC WHATSOEVER. NOT MADE FOR LARGE CALVES. STAYS UP NO PROBLEM. NO BINDING OR MARKS FROM ELASTIC. WEAR THEY ALL THE TIME NOW THAT I FOUND THEM. HUNTED FOR A LONG TIME. DIABETIC SOCKS JUST DID NOT WORK FOR ME. WORTH EVERY PENNY...DO WISH THEY WERE CHEAPER.

These are my year-round socks. I wear them around the house %26 to bed. They are lightweight %26 comfortable. However, after a while some socks get holes in them. But they are still the best socks for me. I recommend them.

100percent cotton sock, little to no stretch, but relax during wearing. Lightweight and cooler than any other sock I've got. Perfect for summer or tight shoes

Loved that they are a thin sock, not too tight on my ankle and made of cotton so cool and warm. It is hard to find good cotton sock in a true to size fit.

I bought them for my mother and she was extremely excited about them because in her, and my own hay-days, Buster Brown shoes and socks spoke to quality assurance but they aren't the same craftsmanship whatsoever of the soft cotton socks we grew up with and imho, the price for these socks for the quality you receive is ridiculous. The cotton is not as soft as the price implies.

Very comfortable seamless socks - good for people with diabetic neuropathy in feet. They will not irritate your feet. I really needed wide socks which were not available, so I ordered the next largest size. They are kind of narrow for me and the heel is not quite deep enough, but other than sizing issues, good quality socks.

Some of my socks came defective, unraveling without ever having been worn. The socks that aren't defective are amazing: super soft, comfortable. They do sag a bit, I used the size chart, but for mostly cotton aside from the elastic at the top, worth it. If you buy these make sure to inspect them incase you need to return them due to defect. For the price per sock, there absolutely should not be holes and unraveling upon arrival.

On July 4, I placed an order for four packs of Buster Brown Ladies Anklets from my tablet. They were promised to arrive on July 8, which they did. Unfortunately I had meant to order white anklets but accidently ordered a multi-pack which I will NEVER wear. I immediately called my local WalMart and they said I could return them there. Imagine my dismay that they couldn't process the return because the order came from my tablet instead of from a $^^*%26^*%26^%$$ cell phone? I was also told to go back home and get the order number and come back and they would process the return. Because of my age and the possibility of having to make a 9-1-1 call, I keep my landline. But, again because of my age, I use a tablet for everything else because it is so much easier to see than a $^^%26**%%23%23 cell phone. So, my question is, if you can process an ORDER from a tablet, why can't you process a RETURN for the same order? This makes absolutely no sense and is a TREMENDOUS inconvenience to the customer. Why can't the order number and a packing slip be generated from an order from a tablet the same way as from a %%26^%26%26**%26^^ cell phone. PLEASE FIX THIS!!