Elizabeth Arden Flawless Finish Skincaring Foundation 130W 30ML

I am super pale, and most lines do not carry a foundation light enough for me. Not only is the lightest shade light enough, it's a shade of off-white, great for mixing with other too-dark foundations. I think I will buy the other two lightest undertones so I can play. Very nice satin-mat finish that lasts all day without cracking or fading.

I have been searching for a quality foundation for a year. I have mature skin and this is absolutely the best smooth and buildable coverage yet. Shade is a perfect match as I am a redhead and need more of a neutral pink tone. I do not have to use a pore concealer with this foundation. Flawless finish is truly the best!

I have been using Elizabeth Arden's Flawless Finish for many years. However why a decision was made to change from using a name for each colour to a number, is beyond me. Stupid!!

I do I do like the quality of the foundation. However this is my second attempt and I just cannot get the right shade. Too pale. I will not be trying again as it is getting a bit expensive!

For reference: I don't like to look like I'm wearing makeup/a lot of makeup. I go for a more natural look. I was using flawless finish perfectly satin, which I LOVE. This foundation is watery compared to the perfectly satin so instead of me having to just use one pump I have to use 3 to get the same coverage.

I've used flawless finish foundation for years, and loved the old formula, lovely, rich and moisturising. The new replacement is watery and once set is drying and sort of gritty feeling. I agree with other negative reviews. It's such a shame that the origina product has been discontinued.

i bought this recently to replace the flawless finish perfectly nude foundation which they have now discontinued, and i absolutely hate it. It doesn't even come close to the old formula, it feels very heavy on the skin and is quite drying, it's clung to dry patches and fine lines on my face which is a shame because the main appeal of the old foundation was how moisturising it was. you need to use a lot more product with this foundation in order to get decent coverage which again contrasts to the last version where a little went a long way. it also has awful flashback in photos, making me look like a ghost. it's nowhere near worth the price and i can only hope they bring back the old one, i will not be buying this again.

I hate it! What possessed you to do away with the mousse? I am 80 years old and have been using your visible difference and the mousse for over 40 years and my face has very few wrinkles - almost none - and I put my skin texture down to these products. Unless you reinstate the mousse I can honestly say I will NOT be using Elizabet Arden again.

I hate it! What possessed you to do away with the mousse? I am 80 years old and have been using your visible difference and the mousse for over 40 years and my face has very few wrinkles - almost none - and I put my skin texture down to these products. Unless you reinstate the mousse I can honestly say I will NOT be using Elizabet Arden again.

i bought this recently to replace the flawless finish perfectly nude foundation which they have now discontinued, and i absolutely hate it. It doesn't even come close to the old formula, it feels very heavy on the skin and is quite drying, it's clung to dry patches and fine lines on my face which is a shame because the main appeal of the old foundation was how moisturising it was. you need to use a lot more product with this foundation in order to get decent coverage which again contrasts to the last version where a little went a long way. it also has awful flashback in photos, making me look like a ghost. it's nowhere near worth the price and i can only hope they bring back the old one, i will not be buying this again.