Jockey Women's Everyday Essentials 100% Cotton Pant
- Brand:
- Jockey
- Model Number:
- 16001
- UPC:
- 037882791467
- EAN:
- 0037882791467
- ASIN:
- B086BSWJHC
- Walmart SKU:
- 790634984
| Price Type | Price | Date |
|---|---|---|
|
Highest Price
|
$61.84 | |
|
Lowest Price
|
$27.72 | |
|
Most Recent Price
|
$50.64 |
Price history data is not available for this product at the moment.
Current Trend: No Walmart.com pricing data available for analysis.
Customer Insights: Rated 4.2/5 from 1014 reviews.
These pants are lightweight and soft, perfect for pj's or lounging around the house. They're great for sensitive skin like mine. I'm 5'4” and around 160 lbs, and the large fits perfect (maybe a little long , but that's OK). I will probably buy more, if I can.
[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] The fit is good and the cotton material is great for warm weather. It's soft but quite substantial. So important is the fact that the pants leg is long enough to reach my feet and even after washing the legs don't shrink up. Most brands shrink so the legs don't even reach your ankles.
Runs large compared to same item in shorts- especially waist. Thinner material than hoped for the high price. Soft. No shrinkage. Legs too wide at bottom & could be a tripping hazard. Pants seem long. Fit fine over knee off-loader brace but still too much fabric below knees & too thin for public use. Bought Small. 5'5” 120 lbs
I ordered a medium (I'm 5'4” tall & weigh 132). They came smelling of chemicals, so I had to soak them in water/vinegar before laundering/wearing them. Having done that, I have no complaints about fit, comfort or quality of materials/construction. I like the color/pattern. I especially appreciate the side pockets. I wear them at home for sleeping and lounging.
good length, material feels amazing. light-weight. im 5'5" lean build, and the Smalls fit good everywhere BUT the waistband. TOO TIGHT! and im small/straight - waisted. im going to ask a friend of mine who sews/alterations , to see if she can get the waistband looser for me. shouldn't be an expensive fix, but just fyi
I really like the idea of these, and the fabric was nice, but I am "short waisted" so the elastic at the waist was too wide for my comfort. Also when I got the size that fit me the pockets jutted out in a funny way! I will still be loyal to Jockey though, I have lots of their products and I like their dedication to quality and reasonable price.
Great to find 100% cotton and reasonably good fit, apart from the length -- I'm 5'6" and the pants are several inches shorter than shown (well above ankle, even before washing, and even shorter afterward). Awkward. Pockets unnecessary for sleepwear and add bulk at hips.
I have been obsessed with the Jockey cotton pants for years. My old ones are at the end of their life and I have been trying to find replacements that I like as much. These are not the ones. Cons: Wide (uncomfortable) waist band, Itchy internal tag, and a more fitted cut. Pros: pockets and 100% cotton.
I've been buying Jockey for years and I'm usually very pleased. The construction of these pants seemed ok and when I first tried them on they felt great but after the first wash - in cool water and medium dryer, they shrank 4inches. I'm not exaggerating, just really disappointed. I'm planning on returning them.
Bought this and believed they would be roomy and wide leg type lounge pants. No they're more like a fitted at the waistband with bell bottoms. Not comfortable in the waist. They have a tight elastic and I wanted a tie front for wearing loose or snug. No give in the waist.
Detailed price history for the past 90 days
No Walmart.com pricing data available for analysis.