Reebok Women's Princess Techy Red / White Black Ankle-High Leather - 9.5M
- Brand:
- Reebok
- Model Number:
- J95025-Rd-9.5 M US
- UPC:
- 886407071795
- EAN:
- 0886407071795
- Walmart SKU:
- 195427779
| Price Type | Price | Date |
|---|---|---|
|
Highest Price
|
$55.00 | |
|
Lowest Price
|
$47.79 | |
|
Most Recent Price
|
$47.79 |
Price history data is not available for this product at the moment.
Current Trend: No Walmart.com pricing data available for analysis.
Customer Insights: Rated 4.3/5 from 2733 reviews.
I have been purchasing these walking shoes for over 25 years. Loved them! The good review is for the now discontinued leather version. WHY has Reebok switched to inferior "synthetic leather"? Sadly, I am now one of thousands of customers who is looking elsewhere for comfortable walking shoes. BRING BACK THE LEATHER PRINCESS SHOES!!!
I've owned the 19-21s and I have to say that ASICS just keep getting this better and better. The 19 for me was a little too tight in the toe box and across the upper but the 20 and the 21 are spot on with improvements in both models. The 21 Lite Show that I own are a fantastic mileage shoe, easy long runs just get done in these shoes and you're ready to go again the next day.
very happy with this shoe. absolutely perfect fit for r a neutral foot. but why is it not water resistant. Asics assume that people don't wear this shoe in wet weather. if it had goretexp layer it would be best neutral running shoe in the world. please add this addition for 22.
I usually wear a U.S. womens size 7 in shoes. The 7s I got were way too small so I exchanged them for 7.5. These shoes fit better but you can see my big toe poking up at the top. I've never worn a size 8 but I'm seriously considering exchanging again.
I was talked into buying these shoes at a Rebook outlet store with the assurance that they would loosen up like the classic shoes I always buy. After two months of aching feet and sore toes these shoes went into the bin. I've never hated a pair of shoes more.
Just received my princess trainers, sorry to say they are being returned. I have worn these trainers for many years found it harder and harder to find them in shops but managed to get these on line and I'm very disappointed with the quality, who decided they should no longer be leather ? Where has the insole with the arch support gone. Why change something that was quality to an inferior product.
Hi, I have used at least one pair of reebook princess every year since approx 1990. I have been in love with them; soft, nice, perfect to my thin feet. Now the upper is made of plastic... They are not nice at all. I'm willing to pay more to get leather and the great feeling back. Please make the upper of leather again!!! I do not know how to survive without them;)!
Bought two pairs over a year ago, but returned them. Despite being advertised as "leather uppers", they are in fact man-made uppers, and are not soft or comfortable and don't have the appearance of leather. But I notice that Reebok still have not changed the description of the Princess shoe. They are still being advertised as soft leather uppers, which they know is untrue.
I loved these shoes and had worn them for years. I always had one pair of black and one of white. My black pair was getting worn looking, and when I was looking for a new pair, all of the stores had fake leather. I tried the website, and they only have the fake leather here too. Please make them in real leather again.
I've worn these shoes for about 30 yrs., 12 months of the year. They were like you were walking on air. Great instep, soft breathable leather, felt better than my indoor slippers. NOT anymore! Now they're crummy plastic shoes with no instep & fell like walking on concrete. I WON'T be buying these again until Reebok goes back to making them the way they use to. I'm not at all happy that I'm being forced to go in search of a comfortable shoe, whoever the manufacturer may be.
Detailed price history for the past 90 days
No Walmart.com pricing data available for analysis.
Third-Party Sellers prices have ranged from $47.79 (Jul 6) to $55.00 (Apr 19) over the past 90 days. Current price is close to the 90-day average of $48.82.
| Date | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| $47.79 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $47.79 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $47.79 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $47.79 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $47.79 | $-7.21 | -13.1% | |
| $55.00 | $+7.21 | +15.1% | |
| $47.79 | — | — |