Swiffer Dusters Refill, Feather Duster Alternative, Unscented, 18 Count

These dusters are super convenient for everyday cleaning. They grab dust really well instead of just moving it around, which makes a big difference. I like that they’re lightweight and easy to use, especially for quick cleanups. The unscented version is perfect because it doesn’t leave any strong smell behind. Really practical and makes keeping the house clean much easier!

This product is so nice, I love clean with that the small places in my home, so is a good and cheap dust product ! The packaging is perfect, I have enough for one moth.

I used this at work and decided to give it a chance in my dusty garage furniture and let me tell you. I dont need to wipe after i use it. It fits my long stick for the ceiling fans and i wash them after i used them so they last a long time for on the budget cleaning supply’s .

Use these Swiffer dusters daily. They pick up better %26 not scatter the dust than any other I've ever used. Highly recommend but please do not modify them. I notice lots of products are being changed to cheaper modifications. I do notice some difference in the Swiffer refills but so far hasn't affected the performance.

I have been using this for four years now originally purchased the full kit with the handle. I am still using the same handle. I like the flexibility of that. The refills are great. The dusting is amazing and easy for anyone, especially if you're older and have problems with your back.

Whoever placed the package in the delivery box should have paid attention. When I received the delivery and opened the box, it looked like someone ran over the box with a hand truck. I do not blame the delivery driver in any way since they would not have known how it was packaged inside the box they were delivering.

I specifically requested unscented swiffer dusters. I bought this unscented product before, and very satisfied. However, to be sent a product in two boxes marked unscented but the product is scented is beyond my understanding. Is it because you ran out of lavender or gain scented boxes that you thought you could just shove these scented dusters in an unscented box? This is an old trick that the clothing industry used to do regarding sizes and still does. Whatever, this issue is dangerous. What could be the reason that there are scented items in an unscented box? I want you to understand this could affect an individual with lung issues. This is truly a hazard for your customers.

What absolute junk. This is the same knock off product that a threw away- worthless. Totally returning.

I used these all of the time for dusting in between deep cleaning - loved them! Then you had to go and change them. They’re terrible now. Those beads do nothing, but make the ends clump together and who wants them dragging across their nice furniture to begin with? Why do you people always choose to screw up a good product?

Swiffer Duster — 1 star These used to work. That's the frustrating part. At some point Procter %26 Gamble quietly changed the formula or the fiber structure or whatever dark cost-cutting magic they performed in their R%26D lab, and now these things are essentially a tiny feather boa that redistributes dust rather than capturing it. You wave it across a shelf, the dust lifts, floats gracefully into the air, and then settles right back where it started — or somewhere worse. You've accomplished nothing except giving your allergies a head start. The whole value proposition of this product was electrostatic attraction. Dust sticks to it. That's it. That's the entire pitch. They somehow broke that. How do you make a duster that doesn't duster? It takes genuine corporate negligence or a procurement team that found a cheaper fiber supplier and signed off without a single quality test. The old version was legitimately good. This one is a $7 placebo for people who want to feel like they cleaned without actually cleaning. Save your money, get a damp microfiber cloth, and accept that P%26G has decided its margins matter more than your baseboards.