TENA Sensitive Care Moderate Absorbency Incontinence Pads, 216 Count
- Brand:
- TENA
- Model Number:
- 768702543743
- UPC:
- 768702543743
- EAN:
- 0768702543743
- ASIN:
- B09FX5BR63
- Walmart SKU:
- 482817124
Remarkable 31-day consistency at $46.17, running matching the quarterly average. This appears to be the established going rate.
| Price Type | Price | Date |
|---|---|---|
|
Highest Price
|
$49.84 | |
|
Lowest Price
|
$39.97 | |
|
Most Recent Price
|
$46.17 |
Tracking History: We have tracked TENA Sensitive Care Moderate Absorbency Incontinence Pads, 216 Count since 12/5/2022. The most recent price update was on Aug 31, 2026.
Price Range: Over the past 90 days, the price has ranged from $39.97 (lowest on 12/5/2022) to $49.84 (highest on 11/29/2024). The average price during this period is $45.53.
Current Trend: Walmart.com prices have ranged from $46.17 (Aug 31) to $46.17 (Aug 31) over the past 90 days. Current price is close to the 90-day average of $46.17.
Customer Insights: Rated 4.5/5 from 2680 reviews.
I have been using this brand item for about a year and a half! I like it and it gets the “job” done for me. Pleased I was able to purchase them online with Walmart. Lately, I have not been able to locate this brand (in the size I've used) in the local Walmart stores. Only the larger/long ones have been in the stores…I've been to several in and around my location.
Only tried this brand a few months ago but am very pleased with them. The no itch promise is real and also the adhesive strip goes down the center of the pad so that the pad isn't stocking to my skin, other clothing of pubic hsir.
This item was actually bought for my sister's visit incase she ran short on her visit to see me!!! Dud not end up needing them, but they are here for her on her next visit.
I love both these products because they really are for sensitive people. They no longer carry in the store for some reason. But thankfully I can get on line. Thank you Walmart
The %234 %26 5 Tena pads are great. However, it would be a little easier if the outer packaging was a little easier to remove to get to the pad otherwise it is different from the others and I like it very much.
The reason why I gave it only four stars is because they're too long. I just wish they were a little bit shorter or if you sold them in half sizes other than that they're great. I actually cut them in half. I have poor bladder control at 70 years old. It's perfect for when I can't make it to the bathroom on time. I am overweight all of the other panty liners are too thin and they don't hold my potty and they crunch up and don't stick to the panties very well. These stick pretty good and stay in place even when they're cut in half. My sister uses these as well and she cuts hers in half but she actually staples the open end cause she doesn't like how the whining is exposed, but I can't imagine using a staple. I told her she's crazy lol
These are both size 4. The one on the left is from a 60 pack, and the one on the right is from a 20 pack. LOL!! Why is there such a huge difference?!?! That being said, I will still continue to use this product as it is the ONLY one that doesn't make me break out. For that, I am grateful. The weird sizing is just something I will have to get used to, I suppose.
If you're really incontenent, these aren't the pads for you. They are small and don't hold very much. It's like wearing just your underwear. You get soaking wet either way. But something more substantial.
These would be perfect if the manufacturers would put adhesive on the entire back of the pad instead of just a strip down the middle. Since they don't, these roll up from both sides into the middle forming a ridge and that, of course, doesn't let them perform as intended. If not for that they would be a great product. I will never buy them again because they will not stay in place.
I bought these ro try due to the claim they are breathable. I've worn Poise ultra thin long for years. I've been having problems with yeast infections with the suspected culprit being plastic lining on pads. I don't care. These Tena are super bulky, to the point I can't close my legs. They are also too short for someone plus size like me. I assumed extra coverage" meant covered more like long. These won't work. It's a shame, I'm tired of having a sweaty, itchy crotch from a plastic lined pad, but these Tena are nothing but a throwback to the 1950's. Cone on people, do better, women deserve better.
Detailed price history for the past 90 days
Walmart.com prices have ranged from $46.17 (Aug 31) to $46.17 (Aug 31) over the past 90 days. Current price is close to the 90-day average of $46.17.
| Date | Price | Change | % Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | $+0.00 | +0.0% | |
| $46.17 | — | — |