Womens Reebok Princess Shoe Size: 11 Stucco - Chalk - Reerubgum Fashion Sneakers price history and forecast - Reebok GZ8649-254
Womens Reebok Princess Shoe Size: 11 Stucco - Chalk - Reerubgum Fashion Sneakers

Womens Reebok Princess Shoe Size: 11 Stucco - Chalk - Reerubgum Fashion Sneakers

Brand:
Reebok
Model Number:
GZ8649-254
UPC:
194819516101
EAN:
0194819516101
Walmart SKU:
643165504

Third-Party Seller Summary

Third-Party Seller Price History Summary
Price Type Price Date
Highest Price
$66.00
Lowest Price
$13.99
Most Recent Price
$64.99
Average Price
$58.99
First Tracked
Last Update

Walmart.com Summary

No price history available for Walmart.com

Price Analysis

Price history data is not available for this product at the moment.

Current Trend: No Walmart.com pricing data available for analysis.

Customer Insights: Rated 4.3/5 from 1042 reviews.

Customer Reviews

1042 reviews

Customer Reviews

4.3
Based on 1042 reviews
5
731
4
132
3
59
2
39
1
81
Filter Reviews:
Sort By:
Showing 10 of 1042 reviews

Bring back the LEATHER Princess Classic!!!!

SueFromToronto May 7, 2015

I have been purchasing these walking shoes for over 25 years. Loved them! The good review is for the now discontinued leather version. WHY has Reebok switched to inferior "synthetic leather"? Sadly, I am now one of thousands of customers who is looking elsewhere for comfortable walking shoes. BRING BACK THE LEATHER PRINCESS SHOES!!!

Was this review helpful?
newreeboks September 11, 2017

A classic model that looks really good. Although not super comfortable at first, I'm sure they'll get better after some time. I've had a pair of Reebok's before (Freestyle HI) that were super soft and comfortable, but they were worn in and quite old. With these ones I had to go a half size up, because how narrow this model is compared to my previous pair. I'm sure I'll be happy in the end - leather will normally stretch out, but wouldn't recommend for a wider foot without trying it on first.

Was this review helpful?

pretender to the throne

Sass April 20, 2014

This shoe has been my go to shoe since i was 14 years old and I am 44 yrs old. It was a nice solid classy shoe that could be worn with jeans, shorts and went with every day to day outfit now it's just junk plastic. The leather was so soft and molded perfectly to my foot, I never felt sweaty or constricted in them. I am sad to find they are no longer leather and the construction quality has deteriorated so drastically. I recently went to purchase another pair online and have found so many negative reviews that I too am looking for a replacement shoe provider. Why would you mess with a product that has been a solid staple in women's wardrobe for generations? This is a classic shoe for classic styles, good luck keeping up in the competitive marketing for trendy shoes. Helpful information gathered from the reviews I have read, a good many of us would pay more to have 'our' shoe returned to original styling and quality materials. Bring back the REAL Princess please!

Was this review helpful?

Not real leather any more

Leatherlover September 24, 2016

I loved these shoes and had worn them for years. I always had one pair of black and one of white. My black pair was getting worn looking, and when I was looking for a new pair, all of the stores had fake leather. I tried the website, and they only have the fake leather here too. Please make them in real leather again.

Was this review helpful?

This product made my heels bleed

London123 March 17, 2015

Bought a pair thinking they would be comfortable tied them up really tight but still got blisters on my heels. The Heel is very hard on these shoes and I cannot wear them so I have wasted my money and am very disspointed that they hurt my heels so much.

Was this review helpful?

Hated these shoes

Achingfeet August 7, 2014

I was talked into buying these shoes at a Rebook outlet store with the assurance that they would loosen up like the classic shoes I always buy. After two months of aching feet and sore toes these shoes went into the bin. I've never hated a pair of shoes more.

Was this review helpful?

dissapointed

andjan April 6, 2015

Just received my princess trainers, sorry to say they are being returned. I have worn these trainers for many years found it harder and harder to find them in shops but managed to get these on line and I'm very disappointed with the quality, who decided they should no longer be leather ? Where has the insole with the arch support gone. Why change something that was quality to an inferior product.

Was this review helpful?
FruLarsson October 9, 2014

No additional comments provided.

Was this review helpful?

No longer leather uppers.

hummingbird February 17, 2014

Bought two pairs over a year ago, but returned them. Despite being advertised as "leather uppers", they are in fact man-made uppers, and are not soft or comfortable and don't have the appearance of leather. But I notice that Reebok still have not changed the description of the Princess shoe. They are still being advertised as soft leather uppers, which they know is untrue.

Was this review helpful?

Plastic uppers ruin great shoe

Missmyshoes May 20, 2016

I've lived in Reebok Princess for over thirty years. Regular, high top, every colour I could find. Now the synthetic uppers make my feet burn and feel clammy. I'm so sad. Why didn't you just raise the price?

Was this review helpful?

Price History

Historical price data graph for Womens Reebok Princess Shoe Size: 11 Stucco - Chalk - Reerubgum Fashion Sneakers

Recent Price Changes

Detailed price history for the past 90 days

Walmart.com Pricing

0 records

No Walmart.com pricing data available for analysis.

No Walmart price history available in the past 90 days
No third-party seller price history available for this product in the past 90 days.